← 返回首页

禁用不健康食品

Unhealthy Food Ban
观点型大作文
🏷️ 观点型📋 ID: 028📝 词数 266

📝 题目

Some people think that shops should not be allowed to sell any food or drink that has scientifically been proved to have bad effects on people's health. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

🤖 作文

I completely agree that shops should be prohibited from selling food and drinks scientifically confirmed to harm human health, for two core reasons related to public health protection and consumer fairness.

First, this ban is the most effective way to reduce the prevalence of diet-related public health crises. Many scientifically verified harmful products, such as sugar-sweetened beverages with proven links to childhood obesity and type 2 diabetes, or processed meats classified as Group 1 carcinogens by the WHO, are widely accessible in local shops, making them easy for consumers, especially minors, to purchase impulsively. Banning their retail availability directly cuts off the most convenient access channel, which has been shown to lower consumption rates significantly: for example, after cities in Mexico banned the sale of sugary drinks in small neighborhood stores in 2020, local sugary drink purchases dropped by 18% within 6 months, alongside a measurable fall in childhood obesity rates in low-income areas.

Second, ordinary consumers often lack the professional knowledge to identify scientifically proven health risks of food products. Many harmful foods are marketed as "healthy" or "convenient" by manufacturers, misleading people into making harmful choices unknowingly. A retail ban removes this information asymmetry, protecting vulnerable groups such as the elderly and children who are less capable of judging product risks accurately.

While some argue adults should have the right to choose their own diet, this right does not extend to products that impose long-term public health costs on society through increased medical burdens. Overall, banning the sale of scientifically proven harmful food and drink is a justified, effective policy to protect public well-being.

结构拆解

审题定位
本题为雅思写作Task 2的"同意与否(to what extent do you agree or disagree)"类题型,核心讨论是否应禁止商店售卖经科学证明有害健康的食品饮料,需要给出明确立场、论证理由并结合实例。
立场选择
范文选择"完全同意"的清晰立场(也可选择部分不同意,例如提出对"有害程度"进行分级管控、避免过度干预个人选择的观点,但清晰一致的立场是雅思写作的核心评分要求)。
开头段
直接给出明确立场,点明两个核心论证方向(公共健康保护、消费者信息差),回应题目全部要求。
主体第一段
从公共健康角度论证,结合世卫组织对加工肉的致癌物分类、墨西哥禁售含糖饮料的真实数据作为实例,论证禁售对降低相关疾病患病率的实际作用,符合题目"结合相关实例"的要求。
主体第二段
从消费者权益角度论证,指出普通消费者缺乏专业判断能力、容易被商家营销误导,说明禁售能保护弱势群体,补全论证逻辑。
让步+结尾段
简要回应反方"个人选择权"的观点,指出有害食品会增加社会整体医疗负担,个人选择权不能损害公共利益,最后重申立场,完成闭环。
评分适配
内容上扣题紧密、论证有具体实例支撑;逻辑上衔接自然、论点清晰;词汇和句式符合雅思写作学术书面表达要求,能够满足7分及以上的评分标准。